Gasland by Josh Fox Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Gasland by Josh Fox - Movie Review ExampleThe thesis of the documentary seeks to inform the audience active the environmental effects and human effects from natural atom smasher drilling. Indeed, the documentary uses dark humor to deal a detailed analysis of the broader effects of the controversial extraction method, hydraulic fracturing, or fracking that is rampant crossways the globe. The documentary seeks to negate the assertion that natural gas is a clean and safe alternative to oil. In addition, the documentary confirms that the fracked wells leak more often thus polluting the environment through water and crinkle pollution, which endangers the environment and disturbs families (Fox Film).Rhetorical (persuasive) Strategies in the DocumentaryNotably, the documentary uses the three persuasive strategies, which include logos, pathos, and ethos. Moreover, the documentary uses rhetorical devices to apply the persuasive strategies to support the argument. In this context, I will focus on sound, speech, and visual images in discussing the rhetorical (persuasive) strategies in the documentary... The speaker further says that a great deal of faith in hoi polloi that we wouldnt succumb to frenzy, or rage, or greed that wed figure out a resolve without destroying the things that we love (Fox Film). This comes in a convincing tone that asserts respect for the environment. More so, Josh Fox says that the purpose from the natural gas company to lease Foxs family land for purposes of drilling natural gas generated a debate in the family. Indeed, Foxs father initially had the thought of leasing the land for the $100,000 fling (Fox Film). On the other hand, Fox tells his father, I think I have to look into this, so build me some time to go ahead and absorb the facts. Indeed, even though, Fox said this in a commanding voice, Foxs father allowed him to seek for facts and evidence regarding the effects of hydraulic fracturing on the residential district neighborin g the drilling site. In fact, Josh Fox is the dominant narrator in the documentary where he gives a personal story. He engaged in interviews, discussions, and debates seeking to unearth the possible environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing. As a result, the film offers facts and evidence in spoken form through the interviews. We advise actually experience Josh Fox talking with residents suffering from chronic health ailments that relate to stemma pollution and water contamination from the drilling of the natural gas using the hydraulic fracturing (Fox Film). This offers facts and evidence in spoken form through the discussions. More so, the residents report on their quest for justice where they visited the court to get an injunction seeking damages from the natural gas companies.