How effectively did the workhouse deal with the needs of the poor? Essay

The phrase needs of the unequal means the condition of the unforesightfulness and what is needed in order to survive. The poor themselves and the ratepayers would see the needs different. The ratepayers would think bear out basic survival was enough, whereas the poor would think more was needed their families should check-out procedure together, shelter, food and clothing etc should be good and sufficient. What they were already used to forward included begging, low wages, child labour, no education etc.The Southwell workhouse compared to others, in particular the Andover workhouse, was much better fairer and less harsh. For examples, on Sundays the families were allowed to visit, and treats were given to the children on special occasions such as Christmas. The Andover workhouse was far less tender-hearted then Southwell, what was to become known as The Andover Scandal was where the inmates were that badly abuse and starved, they resorted to picking the meat of carcasses a nd sucking the marrow out of bones.Southwell workhouse did and did not pass on certain things for the poor. maven thing it did provide was shelter. Allowing them food, a place to stillness/live and clothes, provided this. Although the families were split up, the food always the same boring and arena (gruel, cabbage etc), no individuality, por washing facilities and humiliation, it was a much alternative to outside. approximately groups of the poor were looked after differently and sometimes better this was mainly the sick, the antiquated and the children.They were given certain treatment that the other groups would never receive. They would form had a better life inside the workhouse. However, a lot of people ruling the workhouses discouraged laziness. Even though the jobs were meaningless and didnt teach useful skills it made the inmates learn the routine of work and gave them a strict day-by-day routine. Southwell workhouse also kept the poor off the streets, out of si ght and it cut down the cost of the poor rate, which was all good for ratepayers and the upperclasses.Like all workhouses though, the poor suffered with the stigma of being branded a pauper and everyone knowing it. It was very humiliating. One thing the workhouse did provide was education for the children. However, the education was very basic and didnt really help the majority of children to learn the skills, which would help them to make the counterchange back into society. The children outside the workhouse at this time did not usually have any education though.The idea of a good workhouse is an empty workhouse was much seen to be more important than offering the chance to return back to normality. The workhouse was effective for the ratepayers and it was well organised. It sent out the right message to the poor and helped them realise finding work is better then laziness. However, the poor whitethorn have disagreed because of their treatment. It didnt tackle the cause of pove rty.