Canadian Contribution for World Peace

I have read Suresh Canagarajahs word The Fortunate Traveler Shuttling between Communities and Literacies by Economy Class . He is a good enough writer and he has many good creative have in minder about use uping English to improve literacies. In Suresh Canagarajahs opinion, every English learners need to find a adaptive way, that completelyow enhance their interests to learn English. Countries tradition is influencing local peoples aethestic standard, so many readers are hard to take in strange pen style. As a entreprenant writer, when they faced to conflicting and competing in different communities, they will adjust their writing style.Suresh believes that a curiosity towards the language, the index to intuit languistic rules from observation of actual usage, a metalinguistic awareness of the system pot languages, and the ability to creatively negotiate meaning in text are the good strategy to improve literacy. In my heart, Chinese is my mother language, and I always talk with my Chinese friends. Im afraid of saying something to for English speaker. When I sit on the subway or bus, sometimes I will pay attention to somebodys conversation.At the beginning, I potentiometer catch a itsy-bitsy information, but gradually I feel its hard to follow them. At last, I feel depressed and give up. In Canada, English is apply in everywhere. We can learn many grammar and syntactic from there as long as carefully observed. When we read a long denomination, we maybe feel its difficult to finish and understand its meaning. I was accustomed to transmute word by word, I know its a bad construe habit. In fact, understand the meaning in context can accurately know what message author want to deliver to readers. I think these suggestions are useful.When Suresh Canagarajah come to western academic club, he hasnt get the pass judgment praise. Suresh believes that the exaggerated, passionate personalized style of writing wasnt universally appreciated in the aca demic community. Because Western academic community prefer to smooth and rigid essay rather than personalized and passionate essay. Their tradition and gloss influence the writing style, so they are hard to accept foreign writing style. For example , Chinese people think some Chinese authors opus is very nice, but none of Chinese author can obtain the Nobel Prize in Literature.Because Western audience cant adapt Chinese writing style and understand the meaning. According to Suresh (1986), the conflicts he has faced as he shuttled between his native community and Western academic community generated many useful insights into the ideological and rhetorical challenges in academic communication. He believes that be humble when leaning knowledge, adopt a reflective accomplishment attitude, critical questioning of dominant practices, and contextually grounded theorization are the good way to treat conflicts.As a entreprenant writer, when he faced to conflicting and competing in differ ent communities, they will adjust their writing style. Thus, he can canvass some different kinds of writing style to adapt the audience all over the world . This is a constantly move forward success. I have learned some good strategy to improve lieracy from the article by Suresh Canagarajah, I will try these ideas in learning English. In addition, if I want to write some good essay to transport audiences in Canada, I think I need to change my writing style. Suresh is a good model for me to improve lieracy.