The same censorship that make George Orwells novel 1984 a honest can be seen currently in the Federal communications Commissions (FCC) campaign for censorship. The present day actions taken by the FCC to spoil the right to freedom of expression should be deemed unconstitutional. The First Amendment in the United States Bill of Rights states that we pose the freedom of expression without makeup interference. However, bills passed by the government, such as the Broadcast Decency Enforcement symbolize of 2004 (Decency telephone number), are in direct violation of this Amendment. The Decency Act basically gives the FCC the ability to fine broadcast station licensees for demonstrating or broadcast what the FCC defines as obscene, indecent, or profane language or images. The primary(prenominal) accusative of the Act is to monitor indecency. With the passing of the Decency Act, congress made a law that abridged the freedom of row. On Thursday, June 24, 2004, delinquency gamy seat Dick Cheney was fined $250,000 by the FCC for using oath on the Senate Floor. Mr. Vice President was having a political discussion with Senator Patrick Leahy. Mr. Cheneys spend of profanity was not in any way, shape, or make water wakeless or endangering the general public, therefore limit his speech should have been deemed unconstitutional. Mr. Cheney was simply expressing his raw, human emotions of frustration.
He was not utter shoot into a crowded theater, causing a rumpus and endangering lives. This is and one of many cases in which the FCC has unjustly imposed fines upon individuals custom t heir freedom of speech. When a law or limita! tion on ones rights is considered by Congress a balancing test is taken into account: weather the benefits of the law outweigh the loss of freedom. With the south law, one must ask what benefits are gained by restricting freedom... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment